Intensifying Rhetorical Battle Between Ethiopian Government and Eritrea Triggers Anxieties of Armed Clash

Mounting worries have emerged regarding the chance of armed conflict involving East African neighbours, the Ethiopian government and Eritrea, as confrontational rhetoric has escalated in the last month.

Red Sea coastline
Ethiopia and The Eritrean government were allies in the civil war in Tigray but they have since fallen out.

What Did Ethiopian Officials Declared?

Landlocked Ethiopia's demands for access to the Red Sea through Eritrean territory has provoked a intense war of words.

PM Abiy Ahmed first openly declared in last year that his government's access to the sea was an crucial concern, comments that Eritrean authorities rejected.

Diplomatic connections between the two countries have regularly been difficult. After a decades-long struggle for freedom, the Eritrean state, which has a extensive maritime frontage, formally separated from Ethiopia in 1993, rendering it without sea access.

Subsequently, a border war broke out in which numerous people lost their lives.

Current Statements from Ethiopian Government

Abiy and military leader General Birhanu Jula have openly claimed ownership of Eritrea's maritime facility of Assab – approximately 60 kilometers from the border - and suggested the intention to seize it militarily.

On 1 September, the Prime Minister said the country's "error" of losing access to the sea as a due to Eritrea's separation would be "corrected soon".

Ethiopia's ambassador to Kenya, retired Gen Bacha Debele, said that the port was "Ethiopia's wealth" and would be restored "using武力".

Eritrean Response to the Threats

In the face of persistent threats from Ethiopian officials, Asmara's position has been limited to concise remarks on X from Information Minister the minister.

Officials have denied Ethiopia's demand for access to the Red Sea calling it "risky" and a "negative policy" of "expansionism" – a strategy of claiming back former lands.

Eritrean authorities cautioned on 16 September that efforts to justify "obvious provocation" would have serious consequences for Ethiopia and its neighbouring countries and is a "boundary that should not be crossed|violated|breached".

Security Activities on the Region

There have been no reports of significant troop deployments in the border areas between the both nations.

Nonetheless, in Ethiopia, government media has shown training completions of numerous trainees at multiple army bases.

The head of human resources department of the armed forces, the officer, recently said in an discussion that the army was in a "secure situation" as "many thousands of youths" were enlisting, which he said was "a signal to our enemies".

Historical Background of the Tension

For over fifty years from the late 19th century, Eritrea was governed by Italian colonisers.

After the end of Italian rule, it was then controlled by the British military before becoming a associated territory of the Ethiopian empire.

But in the early 1960s the ruler ended this arrangement and the region became totally absorbed into the Ethiopian state.

A three-decade long armed struggle occurred, ending with military reversal in 1991. Autonomy was then approved by voters in a referendum in 1993.

Briefly in the 1990s, there were good relations between the authorities in Addis Ababa and Asmara, but they clashed over the specific demarcation of their shared boundary, causing conflict in 1998.

Although this ended in a peace deal in 2000, it was incompletely executed, and the two nations remained at odds.

This ended in 2018, when Abiy made gestures to Eritrea's leader the president. The both leaders signed a statement that the war was finished – a decision that gained Abiy the international recognition.

The neighboring states were then cooperators in the country's previous internal conflict in Tigray.

However relations have since broken down again.

Rachel Johnson MD
Rachel Johnson MD

Elias Vance is a Canadian journalist and political analyst with over a decade of experience covering national affairs and policy developments.